Search results

That is often the case with private lawyers. They tend to get very little actual courtroom experience as compared to lawyers in government service or legal aid . It’s how the DA’s office can often attract the the “ best and the brightest “ ( their words -not mine) to public service . Court room...

Let’s wait and see. They might know something we don’t . For example, they know the judge might say “ lack of standing “ for a lot of the places on that list. Or that they know the judge will rule against them— don’t let that be an issue in the case so it is not a precedent for other challenges...

You are absolutely correct on that point.

The felon pulled the gun on the fireman. “The court document shows Taylor pulled a gun and the two men started fighting over the weapon” It had nothing to do with his felony record.

It would make a good political ad but not a lawsuit. The state is immune from such lawsuits .

He wasn’t trying to apprehend him to have him arrested . The felon escalated to a fight. The firefighter did what he did because he was a man defending a woman as many of us were raised to do. Not because he was playing cop.

The great thing we have is that New York is divided among multiple federal court districts . We aren’t dependent on one judge to decide at the district level if CCIA is constitutional or not. All it takes is one of these judges at one of the 4 districts to put on the TRO and it effects the whole...

The NYC restrictions are next, right after the sensitive places thing is overturned.

Did you notice they didn’t try that seven round nonsense again? That’s why this full retard thing is going to backfire on them again. Once it’s case law ( post all appeals) that they can’t do that, don’t worry about it again.

the proposed law NJ is considering is a copy of the CCIA without less exceptions. Plus the way their laws work , it will ban guns for everyone including owners of those businesses, security guards etc. https://gun.lawyer/episode-100-craziest-gun-bill-in-nj-and-thats-sayin-somethin/

I just heard from a friend in NJ. They are now using speeding tickets and divorces as character flaws to deny permits now. The legal battle is just starting

The injunctive relief will come soon. NYS will appeal . It’s the start of their end. They went full retard and they are going to get slapped for it.

The original case https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/committees/criminal/practice/2021/scotus-holds-community-caretaking-does-not-allow-for-warrantless-search/ The 2nd circuit case.

Double post

There is another case before SCOTUS about guns in the home and the 2nd circuit are about to get slapped HARD. They ignored the recent ruling about the caretaker exemption and SCOTUS is not happy.

Yep, that’s the way to go.

Actually the ten round limit was under the old law, hence why it came back into effect when the 7 round law was nullified. Can the 10 round limit be challenged? Absolutely. But that wasn’t the case before the court and that decision was just the 2nd circuit appeals court.

It depended on the community as to the training standard. And some places said you were automatically a part of the militia. If you were a free man, between certain ages, you were required to participate in the militia so gun ownership question would be moot. It was the recognition that...

Eventually but the court decisions in between will chip away at the CCIA law. It’s the same way the seven round limit was gotten rid of. The case law crested keeps them from reintroducing that. It will be the same with this law.

It’s the beginning. I do expect the 2nd circuit to overturn some things in his decision— just because they are bias but some will stand . Then it’s appealed up. Baby steps but still steps forward.

I read the decision the same way as you

The TRO issued today and goes into a effect 3 business days from now is proof , the beginning of their end is here.

There is a historical context for a training requirement for a “ militia”. Individual men ( the militia of that time) had training requirements and were required to be a part of the common defense.

The training requirement is one that might stick around . The rest is what doesn’t have a historical context required under Bruen.

Just to add Supreme Court vacates controversial Massachusetts gun control law Supreme Court vacates controversial Massachusetts gun control law

Gentlemen, it is the start of the end for their stupid policies. They went or are going “ full retard” on their policies. Never go full retard

It should meet the permit training requirement as well. The 8 hour is keep the license. The 47 hour course is get the armed guard license.

I’m not disagreeing with your assessment of the FAQ. I’m disagreeing with their assessment/interpretation of the law. The law seems to have an exemption for the military guys outside of DJCS control. I can be wrong. This is the stuff people go to court over.

I see a loophole to the sensitive area law. Get an armed security license. Then have your wife hire you. It wouldn’t be the first time a bodyguard got romantically involved with a client . Just remember to report the income on your taxes-lol

I don’t know but military veterans seem to be exempt to the training requirement.

I think that the DCJS making that determination rather than the actual law. I didn’t read anything in the law about a time limit as to the training . As for an exception to the training , I found this: affirmed under the penalties of perjury by a duly authorized instructor, except that: (i)...

Yes, to get instructors. Do you think if 20 people get together it’s going to cost 600 each? Some might try to swindle people into doing that. The NRA instructor course doesn’t cost that much

Naa, the LEOSA training is only like 50 dollars and bring your own ammo. Same with the armed security class renewal. It’s just one big class full of people. 50 dollars a person with a class of 30 people , they will make money. And there are enough qualified instructors to have enough competition...

Thank you for the info.

Do you have prior training ? Military is acceptable. Other training may be acceptable. My understanding is that it is a once in a lifetime training requirement so you already might have met it.

Easy. He won his case because he offered to sell them a cake but refused to add their message. That’s the difference.

Actually you can’t. You can’t discriminate as a business owner based on race, religion, creed, etc. The Muslim who comes in to “ convert” people can be kicked out on that behavior but if a Muslim walks in to buy a Bible, no you can’t kick them out just for being a Muslim.

It wouldn’t fly. Someone would say a gun is against their religion and sue for discrimination.

Isn’t that what the bail reform people are doing too-lol

You are right

The new law doesn’t allow for verbal permission nor for the owner to carry unless he puts up the sign-lol

It would have to win against Kavanaugh’s concurrent majority opinion that says permit schemes are okay.

Hang in there guys. The judge in one case step stepped the issue but it won’t continue. When the courts eventually overturn these laws, it will work to our favor.

What? Are you kidding? It was her lawyer who went to the FBI with it. Crossfire hurricane was started the next day. Her lawyer was the one on trial for it.

They were by Hillary Clinton via Perkins Cole law firm. They agreed to pay the fines for Fusion GPS related violation of election law. This doesn’t even cover their illegal activities in Trump -Russia. DNC, Clinton campaign agree to pay FEC fines over Fusion GPS payments for Trump dossier

I think a budget control law kicks in if they even attempt it. The mayor and the city council would lose control of the budget as a result of the state law. But I could be wrong on this.

10 billion is just a percentage of the annual 90+ billion dollar NYC budget. They just need to cut some of the programs DeBlssio put in place when he was Mayor.

What. Trump jr shows up to a meeting set up by the Clinton campaign ( Fusion GPS) to hear dirt on Hillary. The person offers the dirt for a change on Russian policy. Trump Jr walks away . Does not make a deal. There is no crime by Trump jr. That Russian agent met with Glen Simpson of Fusion GPS...

Nope. The prosecution does not get the benefit of the doubt they n our legal system

You mean the meeting with the Russian arraigned by Fusion GPS with Trump jr, who has text messages during the meeting telling someone to call him so he had excuse to leave? The Russian who couldn’t get a visa to enter the country but Obama’s Valerie Jared arraigned for her to get one for the...