SCOTUS craps the bed on CCW expansion case with no explanation

[Saltwater60]

I guess we should be used to this, but it is still aggravating.

SCOTUS Rejects Key CCW Case Gardner v. Maryland

“Am I going to sit here and tell you there’s some game of 4D chess going on?” he asked. “No, because the evidence just doesn’t suggest that.”

gunsamerica.com

 

[C3D]

SCOTUS has no interest in creating a functional CCW right. They are happy to have a theoretical right that is unworkable in real life.

 

[Old Jalopy]

I dont feel SCOTUS gives a rats ass about the Constitution. If so they would have stepped in by now on a lot more.
Wait until they rule AW bans are OK. I have a feeling it's coming soon.

 

[Grimscale]

I dont feel SCOTUS gives a rats ass about the Constitution. If so they would have stepped in by now on a lot more.
Wait until they rule AW bans are OK. I have a feeling it's coming soon.

I think we may lose the mag-ban case first.

 

[Jmac00]

funny, how you expect nine people making 300 grand a year to actually do their job.

I think they spend more time writing books, and speeches, than ruling on the law.

This is another branch of .gov that needs term limits

 

[Old Jalopy]

I think the magazine issue sucks. But, I'd be fine with keeping the limit at this point in time over having to keep my MSRs neutered. It'd be nice to have my MSR restored to factory with adjustable stock, pistol grip, and a removable mag, even if it's only a 10 rounder.

 

[thughes]

It'd be nice to have my MSR restored to factory with adjustable stock, pistol grip, and a removable mag......

Oh, it is.

 

[Saltwater60]

I think the magazine issue sucks. But, I'd be fine with keeping the limit at this point in time over having to keep my MSRs neutered. It'd be nice to have my MSR restored to factory with adjustable stock, pistol grip, and a removable mag, even if it's only a 10 rounder.

I’m not fine with losing any gun rights case or giving up anything ever again. We’ve given too many inches that equate to many miles.
Honestly if you pass a background check you should be able to have anything you want. I mean anything at all. Full machine guns, SBR’s, small explosive projectiles, I mean anything small arms.

 

[TEOTWAWKI inc.]

I’m not fine with losing any gun rights case or giving up anything ever again. We’ve given too many inches that equate to many miles.
Honestly if you pass a background check you should be able to have anything you want. I mean anything at all. Full machine guns, SBR’s, small explosive projectiles, I mean anything small arms.

Just one BGC, or each time you want to buy a gun? State and federal BGC too much, or just federal? BGC to build your own gun?

Why only small arms?

 

[Old Jalopy]

I’m not fine with losing any gun rights case or giving up anything ever again. We’ve given too many inches that equate to many miles.
Honestly if you pass a background check you should be able to have anything you want. I mean anything at all. Full machine guns, SBR’s, small explosive projectiles, I mean anything small arms.

What good will be/do having a 30 round magazine if you have to fix it in the rifle? Anyone who owns a Thordsen knows they are fine for hunting and range time, but not so good for anything else. I had to install a new safety to be able to put the gun back into the safety position using them because you cannot reach it properly. I'm not OK with any of this shit either. But if I have to make a choice to have a 30 round magazine or a proper grip and stock on my MSR, I'll live with a 10 round magazine.
I don't even agree with BG checks. The Constitution does not say "If granted permission". BG checks are an infringement of the Second Amendment.

 

[Saltwater60]

What good will be/do having a 30 round magazine if you have to fix it in the rifle? Anyone who owns a Thordsen knows they are fine for hunting and range time, but not so good for anything else. I had to install a new safety to be able to put the gun back into the safety position using them because you cannot reach it properly. I'm not OK with any of this shit either. But if I have to make a choice to have a 30 round magazine or a proper grip and stock on my MSR, I'll live with a 10 round magazine.
I don't even agree with BG checks. The Constitution does not say "If granted permission". BG checks are an infringement of the Second Amendment.

The issue with not having background checks these days is people are morons. Back when the constitution was parents and others had common sense and wouldn’t have mentally ill morons have guns. The only regulation I’m ok with is keeping guns out of the hands of violent felons and severe mentally ill. I think our background checks are too restrictive currently.

I’d rather have a 30 round fixed mag than 10 rounds fixed, but again I’m not ok with either regulation of mags or how they attach to your guns

 

[Tisto]

What good will be/do having a 30 round magazine if you have to fix it in the rifle? Anyone who owns a Thordsen knows they are fine for hunting and range time, but not so good for anything else. I had to install a new safety to be able to put the gun back into the safety position using them because you cannot reach it properly. I'm not OK with any of this shit either. But if I have to make a choice to have a 30 round magazine or a proper grip and stock on my MSR, I'll live with a 10 round magazine.
I don't even agree with BG checks. The Constitution does not say "If granted permission". BG checks are an infringement of the Second Amendment.

It's not JUST ABOUT YOUR MSR. Hundreds of models of pistols were manufactured with mags that hold more than 10 rounds that are never going to have reduced capacity mags made for them. Even many rifles have mags that hold 10+ that will never be available in compliant form. This renders ALL those weapons useless. And what happens when in a few years tha 10 round number becomes 6 ? You ok with that too ? Then it becomes 2. After that you're throwing rocks. No, being ok with ANY of this is unacceptable. Your post may get you called a FUDD. But, keep kowtowing to those that would subject you. It seems to have worked out well so far.

 

[Cooolone]

In order to enjoy you so called RIGHT, you must EXERCISE them!!! Per SCOTUS!

Rights are not assigned or bestowed! I fail to understand those who seek the courts to "grant" them ... Let alone the one acknowledged, codified and recognized RIGHT that was noted by our farmers with EXPLICIT instructions! Shall Not Be Infringed!

Have a great day!

 

[Old Jalopy]

I hope my wife is serious, and we can just leave all this bullshit in the rearview in a few years. It will not only be great to not have these stupid fucking laws to deal with, but not have to keep arguing useless internet arguments.

 

[Old Jalopy]

It's not JUST ABOUT YOUR MSR. Hundreds of models of pistols were manufactured with mags that hold more than 10 rounds that are never going to have reduced capacity mags made for them. Even many rifles have mags that hold 10+ that will never be available in compliant form. This renders ALL those weapons useless. And what happens when in a few years tha 10 round number becomes 6 ? You ok with that too ? Then it becomes 2. After that you're throwing rocks. No, being ok with ANY of this is unacceptable. Your post may get you called a FUDD. But, keep kowtowing to those that would subject you. It seems to have worked out well so far.

FFS! My guess is your just another chest beater. You big tough man no comply! Me little kowtow cause I no want raped in prison.

 

[Darth]

I’m not fine with losing any gun rights case or giving up anything ever again. We’ve given too many inches that equate to many miles.
Honestly if you pass a background check you should be able to have anything you want. I mean anything at all. Full machine guns, SBR’s, small explosive projectiles, I mean anything small arms.

You lost me at “background checks” and “small arms.”