THE ADVENTURES OF THE 47TH PRESIDENT....

[tirwin1]

Glad you can name one good thing, again, no mass deportations. not much better means he’s a tiny bit better. I’ll give Trump that, strong border. Doesn’t mean I’m going to say he’s doing a great job because he’s followed through with the one campaign promise.

3 million illegals have left the country - 900,000 deportations and the rest left on their own. I'd say that's a damned good start.

The left has made deportations politically difficult with their theatrics. As we saw in Minnesota they want protesters to die to stir up outrage in the media. I personally don't care if they leave via deportation or on their own as long as they leave.

 

[livingston]

Glad you can name one good thing, again, no mass deportations. not much better means he’s a tiny bit better. I’ll give Trump that, strong border. Doesn’t mean I’m going to say he’s doing a great job because he’s followed through with the one campaign promise.

Hundreds of judges reject Trump’s mandatory detention policy, with no end in sight​

More than 300 federal judges, including appointees of every president since Ronald Reagan, have now rebuffed the administration’s six-month-old effort to expand its so-called “mandatory detention” policy, according to a POLITICO analysis of court dockets from across the country. Those judges have ordered immigrants’ release or the opportunity for bond hearings in more than 1,600 cases.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/05/trump-administration-immigrants-mandatory-detention-00709494

Liberals knew what they were doing.... Bring in millions of un vetted illegals and then declare everyone needs their day in court. to deport. The sheer volume of cases means hardly any get heard. Over whelm the system .. I am sure you are aware Trump has had roadblocks thrown up at every turn ... Even at the smallest things .

 

[livingston]

March 13, 2017
The government currently cannot afford to pay for more than a small fraction of a physical barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 25, 2017, directing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to “plan, design and construct a physical wall” or similarly “impassable physical barriers,” such as a fence, along the Southwest border. On February 20, DHS Secretary John Kelly issued a memorandum implementing the president’s executive order, directing the department to immediately start the construction of a wall. Yet, no tangible discussion of funding is included.
Although President Trump maintains authority under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996 and the Secure Fence Act of 2006 to construct a physical barrier along the Southwest border, he does not have the ability to pay for a significant portion of the barrier’s construction. A recent internal DHS report to Secretary Kelly finds that constructing a physical barrier along 1,250 miles of the Southwest border will cost American taxpayers about $21.6 billion, though other estimates put the figure as high as $31.2 billion.

Money and the Southwest Border Wall: Why the President Cannot Immediately Pay For a Full Border Wall - National Immigration Forum

The government currently cannot afford to pay for more than a small fraction of a physical barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 25, 2017, directing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to “plan, design and construct a physical...

forumtogether.org

House Democrats

@HouseDemocrats

Last year, Republicans gave ICE $140 billion.Now, Republicans want to give ICE $70 billion more.Your taxpayer dollars are funding an out-of-control mass deportation machine.
2:01 PM · May 28, 2026
·
2.5M
Views

https://x.com/HouseDemocrats/status/2060058873268953397?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2060058873268953397%7Ctwgr%5E44f6ebd54c2af80dfbec0e807466912db92b8533%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Frevolver.news%2F2026%2F05%2Fdems-anti-ice-post-backfires-and-turns-into-a-right-wing-ad-for-mass-deportations%2F

 

[DoD1776]

3 million illegals have left the country - 900,000 deportations and the rest left on their own. I'd say that's a damned good start.

The left has made deportations politically difficult with their theatrics. As we saw in Minnesota they want protesters to die to stir up outrage in the media. I personally don't care if they leave via deportation or on their own as long as they leave.

DHS claims 1.9mil left voluntarily through self deportations and 600k at the one year mark… that is PENNIES on the dollar.

Groups like the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) estimate the number of formal removals handled by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to be closer to 290,000 during this time period. Deportation Data Project estimates around 350,000 formal deportations.

So hard to say if DHS is being truthful. Unlike previous administrations, the Trump administration has not released deportation data. Instead, the Department of Homeland Security provides updates via press releases.

“
DHS also cites another data point: people who left the country voluntarily. During Trump’s second term, DHS says, 1.9 million people self-deported.

As with other deportation figures, DHS provided no evidence for this number. In September, Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem said 1.6 million people had voluntarily left the U.S. under Trump. But that number came from one research group’s estimate based on a survey with a small sample size and large margin of error. And the figure represented not only people who might have voluntarily left the U.S., but also people who were deported, died or whose status changed such as by receiving asylum.”

 

[nortatoga]

 

[tirwin1]

 

[GOPerfect]

View attachment 283539

I would buy one or two just to have them and keep them.

 

[Mosinitis]

$250 and $100 on the same bill with Trump's face on it, probably something made up by the trolling Democrats...... and someone took the bait.

 

[livingston]

 

[Bigfoot]

I would buy one or two just to have them and keep them.

Trump $250 bill for the 250th anniversary.


"Key administration officials are pushing the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Engraving and Printing to design a $250 banknote with Trump’s image."

Trump’s team pushes for new $250 bill with his face on it — but there’s a big catch

The $250 note would be a a nod to America’s 250th birthday this year.

nypost.com

But there's a big catch -
"Under the Thayer Amendment, which passed in 1866, it is illegal to put the likeness of a living person on official US currency, bonds, or other financial notes."

 

[livingston]

Police: Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Virginia Home Targeted in ‘Swatting’ Call​

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/05/29/police-supreme-court-justice-amy-coney-barretts-home-targeted-swatting/

 

[GOPerfect]

Trump $250 bill for the 250th anniversary.


"Key administration officials are pushing the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Engraving and Printing to design a $250 banknote with Trump’s image."

Trump’s team pushes for new $250 bill with his face on it — but there’s a big catch

The $250 note would be a a nod to America’s 250th birthday this year.

nypost.com

But there's a big catch -
"Under the Thayer Amendment, which passed in 1866, it is illegal to put the likeness of a living person on official US currency, bonds, or other financial notes."

I love how the left is losing their minds over this

 

[nortatoga]

I love how the left is losing their minds over this

 

[Bigfoot]

I love how the left is losing their minds over this

I think that President Trump's face should be on all 7 denominations.
And on every coin too...

 

[spat]

I think that President Trump's face should be on all 7 denominations.
And on every coin too...

Instantly solve the water crisis out west.

Giant pool covers with Trump's face on every reservoir.

Then attach a desalination plant to remove the salt from the resulting liberal tears.

 

[Uzi]

I know shit's bad right now, but I can't wait for the UFC match at the white house. I heard there will be monster trucks too! yee haww 'merica! fuck yeah!

 

[DoD1776]

 

[Bigfoot]

Pro Tip - Don't be gullible.

 

[DoD1776]

Pro Tip - Don't be gullible.

Pro tip - Google is free

 

[Bigfoot]

I know shit's bad right now, but I can't wait for the UFC match at the white house. I heard there will be monster trucks too! yee haww 'merica! fuck yeah!

Woo Hoo! - I can dig it!

 

[Bigfoot]

"President Donald Trump is in “excellent health,” the White House physician said Friday in a memo the administration released after Trump’s visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center — his third in-person medical checkup in 13 months."

Trump in ‘excellent health’ after latest checkup, president’s physician says

Trump, who will turn 80 in June, is the oldest person to assume the presidency.

www.nbcnews.com

“He is fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief,” Dr. Sean Barbabella, the president’s physician, wrote in the memo.

 

[Steal2B]

Pro tip - Google is free

Disingenuous Dayten, especially if you read the Defense Appropriations Bill in the free Google information you espoused

Section 224 in the House Defense Bill (not yet past the Senate) does not integrate US and Israel militaries. It has a limited scope and impact with some partnerships and reflects some business practices (good or bad) enjoyed with NATO allies

1) It allows some joint development and integration of advanced battlefield systems such as AI, quantum computing, autonomous systems, biotechnology, and cyber warfare partnerships.

2) Similar to NATO the legislation explicitly details "network integration" and "data fusion," permitting potential real-time military data being shared seamlessly between the U.S. Pentagon and the Israel Defense Forces.

3) Again like NATO it moves away from annual State Department-administered foreign aid model towards a Pentagon procurement, co-production, and licensing of weapons on U.S. soil.

The published pushback and concerns of the section 224 issues (putting aside tinfoil hats of generic Israel or Jewish conspiracy theorists) revolve around annual political control .... since section 224 of the Act imbeds part of the U.S.-Israel military relationship in to the bureaucratic defense acquisition process and strips away Executive Branch diplomatic strings (Trump may not be happy with this aspect) and cuts some links to Congressional Branch voted foreign aid checks (Schummer may not be happy with this aspect)

Liberals are bitching that co-producing weapons with Israel in several U.S. States builds a domestic economic dependency and would make the military partnership difficult to politically unwind (Yeah, all rewards have some risk)

 

[Bigfoot]

Pro Tip - Don't be gullible.

Pro tip - Google is free

 

[Defilade]

View attachment 283595View attachment 283597View attachment 283598

Israel First! All those idiots mocking truth by saying "It's the Jooooos".... Yeah it is retards. Money has bought the agenda as we are an Occupied Nation. This looks like a form of Treason

 

[Bigfoot]

 

[DoD1776]

Disingenuous Dayten, especially if you read the Defense Appropriations Bill in the free Google information you espoused

Section 224 in the House Defense Bill (not yet past the Senate) does not integrate US and Israel militaries. It has a limited scope and impact with some partnerships and reflects some business practices (good or bad) enjoyed with NATO allies

1) It allows some joint development and integration of advanced battlefield systems such as AI, quantum computing, autonomous systems, biotechnology, and cyber warfare partnerships.

2) Similar to NATO the legislation explicitly details "network integration" and "data fusion," permitting potential real-time military data being shared seamlessly between the U.S. Pentagon and the Israel Defense Forces.

3) Again like NATO it moves away from annual State Department-administered foreign aid model towards a Pentagon procurement, co-production, and licensing of weapons on U.S. soil.

The published pushback and concerns of the section 224 issues (putting aside tinfoil hats of generic Israel or Jewish conspiracy theorists) revolve around annual political control .... since section 224 of the Act imbeds part of the U.S.-Israel military relationship in to the bureaucratic defense acquisition process and strips away Executive Branch diplomatic strings (Trump may not be happy with this aspect) and cuts some links to Congressional Branch voted foreign aid checks (Schummer may not be happy with this aspect)

Liberals are bitching that co-producing weapons with Israel in several U.S. States builds a domestic economic dependency and would make the military partnership difficult to politically unwind (Yeah, all rewards have some risk)

If you mean most Americans instead of liberals then ya… we don’t support it. Nothing disingenuous about what was shown. In summary you just said there is integration without wanting to admit that they’re integrating… you are disingenuous. These people cannot be trusted.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/12/israel-white-house-spying-devices-1491351

Israeli espionage in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Congress quietly moves to integrate US and Israeli militaries

In the first step towards shifting aid further into the shadows, the House's 2027 NDAA would all but fuse the two countries' armed forces together

responsiblestatecraft.org

MSN

 

[DoD1776]

Here’s the folks that introduced this into the NDAA. Color me surprised.

Israel First! All those idiots mocking truth by saying "It's the Jooooos".... Yeah it is retards. Money has bought the agenda as we are an Occupied Nation. This looks like a form of Treason

 

[Steal2B]

If you mean most Americans instead of liberals then ya… we don’t support it. Nothing disingenuous about what was shown. In summary you just said there is integration without wanting to admit that they’re integrating… you are disingenuous. These people cannot be trusted.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/12/israel-white-house-spying-devices-1491351

Israeli espionage in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Congress quietly moves to integrate US and Israeli militaries

In the first step towards shifting aid further into the shadows, the House's 2027 NDAA would all but fuse the two countries' armed forces together

responsiblestatecraft.org

MSN

If you read the bill you know damn well that the scope of 224 (which still is not out of congress) does not "all but fuse the two countries' armed forces together." On both sides of this ball, there is too much special interest involved with the spending for my taste.

So far it looks like 224 will not survive the Senate, so it's a bit early for your panties to get knotted up. If 224 bothers you so much, instead of whining on this fine forum, man up and drop Chucky and Kirsten a line .... they will do what they can on this issue to kill 224. That's one of the ways a grown man can react in this great Republic. (Don't be afraid. I don't like Schumer or Gillibrand and they are not crazy about me but they do have some nice and effective people on their staff. Your message will not be ignored and on this issue I believe they are in alignment with you. Go get'em and hold their feet to the fire)

Either way, if you read the bill and still believe the bill section will "all but fuse the two countries' armed forces together" you got bigger issues going on that you need to work on ... Instead of playing keyboard warrior here and losing a pissing contest that you are woefully unprepared, maybe you can work on those other personal issues.

I'm moving on, like others I'm bored with these tirades.

 

[DoD1776]

If you read the bill you know damn well that the scope of 224 (which still is not out of congress) does not "all but fuse the two countries' armed forces together." On both sides of this ball, there is too much special interest involved with the spending for my taste.

So far it looks like 224 will not survive the Senate, so it's a bit early for your panties to get knotted up. If 224 bothers you so much, instead of whining on this fine forum, man up and drop Chucky and Kirsten a line .... they will do what they can on this issue to kill 224. That's one of the ways a grown man can react in this great Republic. (Don't be afraid. I don't like Schumer or Gillibrand and they are not crazy about me but they do have some nice and effective people on their staff. Your message will not be ignored and on this issue I believe they are in alignment with you. Go get'em and hold their feet to the fire)

Either way, if you read the bill and still believe the bill section will "all but fuse the two countries' armed forces together" you got bigger issues going on that you need to work on ... Instead of playing keyboard warrior here and losing a pissing contest that you are woefully unprepared, maybe you can work on those other personal issues.

I'm moving on, like others I'm bored with these tirades.

Read the article, not just the title

 

[Steal2B]

Read the article, not just the title

Disingenuous Dayten, especially if you read the Defense Appropriations Bill

Either way, if you read the bill

Dayten, Dayten, Dayten. There you go again.

Three times it was suggested you read the bill. Not the title, not some opinion article, the bill.

224 may suck, but if you read the Bill you will see it does not "all but fuse the two countries' armed forces together."