



yup. been like this for a while now, I dont know what they are getting from other allies, but im sure its not enough, Its not just the missiles either, they require multiple radar sites to triangulate and target the missile sIt sounds like Ukraine is about out of air defense missiles.
It sounds like the US doesn't have any more to spare to resupply Ukraine.
Ukraine is going to be in a world of trouble soon if they can't stop Russia drone, missiles and bombers now.
yup. been like this for a while now, I dont know what they are getting from other allies, but im sure its not enough, Its not just the missiles either, they require multiple radar sites to triangulate and target the missile s
considering the amount of available aircraft they have, this isnt a game changer . And they are very short on air defense missiles,armor, and infantry. the game is over , anyone can see it . Its just a question of time now.View attachment 287171View attachment 287170View attachment 287173View attachment 287172
![]()
Ukraine’s ‘Equalizer’ bomb aims to blow up reliance on US, European weapons
Ukraine's new Vyrivniuvach glide bomb lets MiG-29 and Su-27 pilots strike Russian forces from safer distances while reducing reliance on U.S. weapons.www.foxnews.com
So how many more years do you think before they get to Kiev ?considering the amount of available aircraft they have, this isnt a game changer . And they are very short on air defense missiles,armor, and infantry. the game is over , anyone can see it . Its just a question of time now.
the Russians have been making some good headway since they dropped some of the bridges over the Dniper river. seems the Ukies are being forced back quite a bit
An attack on the UK would fully involve NATO. Putin can't even handle Ukraine with some NATO hand-me-downs.So.....
Is anyone curious about why the CIA director Ratcliffe made a sudden surprise visit to Moscow yesterday for reasons unknown,
And also simultaneously,
Yesterday, Russia warned the UK that they should expect military retaliation for their continued military support of Ukraine killing Russians
And there are rumors of the UK PM quietly being relocated as well as the King.
Also, unverified"rumors" which appears to be conflicting accuracy, that the US embassy in Moscow was closing up shop after Ratcliffes surprise visit to Moscow was alleged to not go well.
This barely made the news cycle except for alternative media but it could spell big time escalation and trouble.
Or,It started with sending only defensive weapons to Ukraine and using them only on Ukrainian territory.
Every escalation decision made by NATO was based on expectation that Russia will not respond.
Every time Russia did not respond to avoid escalation, brought more escalation.
Maybe they had enough.
Or,
And this is just me throwing this out there.
Russia could fuck off back to the 1990s borders and stop an entire generation of Russians from dying.
The ridiculous NATO limits for "defense only" are the reason this has gone on so long.
They should have given Ukraine enough to crush the Russians right from the beginning any place they tried to organize troops.
Yes, they were stupid.They were scared of Russia's response. British and German missiles hitting Moscow and other Russian cities would have triggered a mirrored response from Russia. NATO had to proceed in steps, but now it reached the same point and all bets are ostupid.
So.....
Is anyone curious about why the CIA director Ratcliffe made a sudden surprise visit to Moscow yesterday for reasons unknown,
And also simultaneously,
Yesterday, Russia warned the UK that they should expect military retaliation for their continued military support of Ukraine killing Russians
And there are rumors of the UK PM quietly being relocated as well as the King.
Also, unverified"rumors" which appears to be conflicting accuracy, that the US embassy in Moscow was closing up shop after Ratcliffes surprise visit to Moscow was alleged to not go well.
This barely made the news cycle except for alternative media but it could spell big time escalation and trouble.
Some internet chatter, cant say if its valid , but makes sense with the recent vist
Russia issues strong warning against the United Kingdom, stating that British military assets and equipment will be targets of direct responses from Russia, within Ukraine and in other countries. Maria Zakharova's statement reinforces rumors that Russia has been preparing a retaliatory strike on British assets due to its recent escalation in involvement in attacks against Russia.
Russia-NATO tensions are rising:Russia is preparing for the possibility of a Western military move near Kaliningrad. Kaliningrad’s strategic position makes it one of the most sensitive flashpoints between Russia and the alliance.
My impression is that Russia is saying it will use Nukes if Nato invades Kaliningrad , specificly against the UK mainland .
I dont hink Nato will do that, but is just trying to apply pressure to take some heat off Ukraine (Hopefully)
From multiple confirmed sources Ratcliffe delivered key security demands, warnings, and advice from the Trump administration to Russian intelligence which is the language Putin understands. The main points seem to be ....
Do Not Attack NATO:
Ratcliffe warned Russia against launching any overt or covert military or hybrid sabotage actions against NATO countries, particularly the Baltic states after U.S. intelligence assessments suggest Putin might test the alliance's resolve with a limited assault. They also discussed near border NATO training that the US did not endorse.
Cut Ties with Iran:
Ratcliffe esentially demanded that Moscow stop sharing intelligence, weapons, and defense technology with Iran.
End the Ukraine War:
Acting as a discreet messenger, Ratcliffe presented a bleak assessment of Russia's heavy battlefield losses and minimal territorial gains. He advised Russia to enter serious negotiations to end the war before Russia has a weaker bargaining position as its economic and military situation worsens further.
![]()
C.I.A. Chief Delivered Bleak Assessment of Russia’s War in Secretive Moscow Visit
John Ratcliffe’s meeting this week with a Russian intelligence chief was aimed at pushing the Kremlin to pursue a peace deal with Ukraine.www.nytimes.com
Ratcliffe didnt have to go to Moscow to know Russia wont do any of it .From multiple confirmed sources Ratcliffe delivered key security demands, warnings, and advice from the Trump administration to Russian intelligence which is the language Putin understands. The main points seem to be ....
Do Not Attack NATO:
Ratcliffe warned Russia against launching any overt or covert military or hybrid sabotage actions against NATO countries, particularly the Baltic states after U.S. intelligence assessments suggest Putin might test the alliance's resolve with a limited assault. They also discussed near border NATO training that the US did not endorse.
Cut Ties with Iran:
Ratcliffe esentially demanded that Moscow stop sharing intelligence, weapons, and defense technology with Iran.
End the Ukraine War:
Acting as a discreet messenger, Ratcliffe presented a bleak assessment of Russia's heavy battlefield losses and minimal territorial gains. He advised Russia to enter serious negotiations to end the war before Russia has a weaker bargaining position as its economic and military situation worsens further.
![]()
C.I.A. Chief Delivered Bleak Assessment of Russia’s War in Secretive Moscow Visit
John Ratcliffe’s meeting this week with a Russian intelligence chief was aimed at pushing the Kremlin to pursue a peace deal with Ukraine.www.nytimes.com
U.S. intelligence assessments suggest Putin might test the alliance's resolve with a limited assault.
a bleak assessment of Russia's heavy battlefield losses and minimal territorial gains
They didn't need the Ukraine headache at all either, but here we are.Ratcliffe didnt have to go to Moscow to know Russia wont do any of it .
How do you reconcile the major losses, while planning to attack Nato forces ? that doesnt make a lot of sense to me. On one hand Russia is getting its ass kicked and cant take ground but thinks its a good idea to attack the Baltic country's and possibly NATO? theyre struggling enough with Ukraine, they dont need any more headaches to deal with
I cant buy that that story , what I can buy is, NATO is looking for a door, to enter the war
theres no way Russia is going to stop aid to Iran Unless NATO stops aid to Ukraine , nothing in it for them , If NATO and US are going to do it to them then they are going to do it to US and NATO.
You're right on your points.Ratcliffe didnt have to go to Moscow to know Russia wont do any of it .
How do you reconcile the major losses, while planning to attack Nato forces ? that doesnt make a lot of sense to me. On one hand Russia is getting its ass kicked and cant take ground but thinks its a good idea to attack the Baltic country's and possibly NATO? theyre struggling enough with Ukraine, they dont need any more headaches to deal with
I cant buy that that story , what I can buy is, NATO is looking for a door, to enter the war
theres no way Russia is going to stop aid to Iran Unless NATO stops aid to Ukraine , nothing in it for them , If NATO and US are going to do it to them then they are going to do it to US and NATO.
1b) communicate that we do not endorse NATO exercises so close to Russian Territory 2)
We already showed our hand on that.This sort of plays right into the hands of the Russians, The Russians will perceive we are not united , that Nato is cracking , might actually have the opposite effect .
Perhaps the Russians are seeing what Trump sees: NATO is primarily funded and actions in its name are primarily American and Trump has called out the other member Countries and rightly so...look at what England did in refusing to allow our Aircraft to land or operate out of their Bases, and while pointing out ineffectual organizations, lets not forget the biggest fuck up of all the United Nations...Wouldn't surprise or sadden me in the least if we kicked both to the Curb, and DJT is the Man to do it.This sort of plays right into the hands of the Russians, The Russians will perceive we are not united , that Nato is cracking , might actually have the opposite effect .