Search results

I did. And I am even not arguing he was right. However, he could still change his mind about the littering and arrest him just like the guy changed his mind and then went to DA. See what the argument was about. Someone was calling out that one of the cops who responded should be punished too.

1% of everyone he talks to. Or 1% of everyone he stops? How many people do you think he stops , he knows is armed ? Now if you said, every car he stops of a traffic infraction, he makes the people get out of the car and frisks them, you might have an argument with that 1%. But for the sake of...

Oh, now someone wants to go after the other cop. Okay . Now I am going to tell you some things that will piss you off but are true. The 911 call being faked is moot because that officer doesn’t know who called that particular call with that info yet. He also is told that it was the parents who...

If the daughter was in that house or houses, would you see his actions the same way?

It’s in the point of view of who is the asshole . As opposed to making a mistake .

You have no idea what you are talking about. 1% ? 1% of what? The general population as a whole ? That’s like looking at the entire military personnel and declaring Afghanistan statically safe. And in the first desert storm campaign, it was statistically safer there than in the US. 148 combat...

Being that a— hole is often a point of view. Watch this CCW person ( assuming he has one) tell his war story and ask should he face 20 years in jail. Or honestly serious jail time for his actions — it’s all in your point of view If you don’t feel for this guy, you don’t have a daughter -lol...

That’s different if they are getting rid of that position. Then give the doctor is contracted severance pay as he walks out the door. And it’s not just union bs. It’s labor law and contract law . Not from just the unions . It’s in the At will work states as well.

If it’s just to hide something from your employer—- like discussion about your work conditions or illegal acts by the employer with the person who can do something about it, and by law has access to the worksite to observe those conditions and have “privileged” ( at least from the...

If this was the only part of the video, you would say they had no reason:

So if the hospital said we want cleaner toilets and the hospital administrator said, I want you Dr so-and-so to clean the toilets , the doctor has to? Despite being hired and contracted to be a doctor there? Civil service have “ title rights “. If you were hired for one job and they demand you...

Incorrect. Can your employer record privileged communications between you and your lawyer at work ? How about if an employee wants to talk to the union delegate or shop steward about unsafe or illegal conditions? And my response of “incorrect “ was to say because one doesn’t want to be recorded...

That’s far from the truth ,

Did he resist putting his hands behind his back to be handcuffed? When someone goes stiff armed, sometimes hitting them is the only way to over come that resistance

It means if they do so, SCOTUS will completely reverse their ruling, and publicly embarrass them in their opinion, and not give the appeals court any sway or influence over the case law. Publicly told they ignored SCOTUS and the constitution. That’s a big deal for a judge and any chance for...

I’m not arguing that. I’m just explaining that it’s not a pure SAFE act violation .

Is this the rifle that person had because it’s not semi-auto . He was charged with having a semi auto rifle with the “ evil “ features.

Quoting from the article you will find if you follow the links; Windham Weaponry rifle with a forward hand grip, pistol grip and flash suppressor” That’s three evil features. I don’t know the rifle but they charged him as if was a semi auto assault rifle “Gomula was charged by state police on...

They aren’t going to send it back down unless they can give new instructions to the judge in how the decision is to be made—they will get bitch slapped if they do that. They are more likely to attempt to tailor the decision to keep as much stuff as they can and pass SCOTUS muster— they don’t...

I think they are slow walking it as much as they think they can get away with it . If 3/20 is the hearing date, I wouldn’t expect the opinion/decision until late summer.

I didn’t mention the magazine for the very reason you mention. But the rifle was illegal before the safe act therefore it’s not a pure safe act violation. Once this CCIA bs is defeated in court , the “ assault rifle” evil feature bans should be on the list to be challenged.

Not a pure safe act. The rifle had THREE ( pistol grip, a forward grip and a flash suspensor ) evil features as well as 30 round magazine. I believe it was illegal before the SAFE act.

Ironically it’s the previous loss in court over the seven round thing that now protects us from the same attempt here again. The 2nd circuit made the bottom 10 rounds

Good point to remember for the legal challenges if it passes

They could run a background check any time they want. The difference is what the applicant is forced to do.

The recertification and renewal is just a harassment process. Nothing about the applicant is done that couldn’t be done by just having a person in the permit office run a computer check without bothering the permit holder

They will try all of that but it will not pass muster. Civil cases are decided by juries . And when a jury sees someone who got a permit but was arrested anyway on a law that was known to be unconstitutional before it was enforced, they tend to react— liberal or not. Judges also are known to...

What will happen is that eventually someone will get arrested for a law that is unconstitutional ( and ruled unconstitutional by SCOTUS) and someone will become rich.

My understanding is that is still under the rifle definition as far as most of the law is concerned. If you were to transport the rifle into NYC, you wouldn’t be charged with the felony possession as you would as if you had a handgun but with some type of possession of a rifle local law.

Or, the sign can be interpreted as there is no act that will be considered a crime in the zone too

They are still firearms under the law. Its possession falls under one of the exemptions which is having a permit .

In New York State law, firearms are often legally different than shotguns and rifles but are all handguns. All firearms are illegal in New York except under certain exemptions, one of which is having a permit. That’s why one can’t own a gun or possess without a permit or other exemption in the...

Where is the federal discrimination lawsuit against him. Or even CA state lawsuit.

If you look into it , it is proposed as satire, to what the democrats have done. It’s sponsored by republicans.

Desantis baggage was handled better. Ask why do they hate Trump? His policies? His policies were not only right but they copied them when they came to power ( immigration, China travel ban). It’s his plain speak and that he ran as a republican.

Or maybe they will Ron Brown him . And Jordan is the last person one wants to wrestle against .

I think Desantis knows what he would be walking into as opposed to Trump who was naive and thought the establishment republicans would come around with his peace offering of certain positions.

Trump is a lightning rod for the democrats and the press. He has too much baggage. The swamp can be drained but let Desantis take the top position. I have more trust in individual candidates with Track record than whole parties but certain parties have to be in power for those individuals to...

That was one of the major issues discussed in the documentary with the emergency management people they interviewed. Cities like Los Angeles would be a less valuable target because it’s spread out already but NYC, Chicago, Boston, etc are dense in comparison. They speak of how the infrastructure...

The idea is to spread out . It will be into the smaller towns and more rural areas. They explain it in this old history channel special. I found a link to the trailer and not the full special

I can definitely see it escalating to a full exchange with Russia or China but what of North Korea and Iran ? We could melt them into slag but they could only make a limited exchange compared to us or the other two near peers. But just think of the damage of just one used by a terrorist group ...

I assumed a missile launch for the EMP. Yes, the nuke fingerprint could tell you a source if that source material was on file( which reactor created it). But what if it’s not on file ? Or was a Soviet era device ( refurbished). Are we going to launch against Russia not knowing if it was stolen...

Wall Street and the exchange in Chicago. There are a female movie actors I would like to see more of too-lol

I think they could just but it on a few passenger airline jets and have them blow up as they approach the airports. How long would it take figure out who set them off. And all it would take is one or two launched and detonated at a high altitude above the US to cause major damage to the USA...

You are thinking about Russia or China. A limited exchange could be from another country who have a limited nuclear ability like North Korea and possibly Iran in a few years .

That depends on who is doing the nuking. And how many nukes. If your country can only launch on 6 to 12 targets, what would damage the US the most? Hitting the cites or petroleum refinery areas would be my guess. Or make it EMP most of the country.

Fallout in a limited exchange would be limited. Most of the effects would dissipate in two weeks. The long term would be horrific too but not in a span of time we usually think of . It would be like long term 9/11 effects just at more locations .

The death toll would only be part of the problem. A fictional book Warday is one of a limited nuclear exchange. The economic damage alone would split the country as regional governments would fight ( not necessarily physically fight) for the remaining resources .

There used to be a few peace officer organizations like society to prevent child abuse or animal abuse— I don’t remember exactly. It was in the CPL that members were given peace officer status and joined just for gun privileges. They have since shut down that loophole