The entertaining part will be in "infighting demographics" of what percentage decentant you are to qualify for the Reparations Welfare.![]()
it would likely be tied to some arbitrary progressive scale, and get very complicated when your watered down slave lineage crosses with another several generations after emancipation.The entertaining part will be in "infighting demographics" of what percentage decentant you are to qualify for the Reparations Welfare.![]()

Slavery in the territory that became the United States dates back to 1526 are they going all the way back? If so I want my share My 9th G. grandfather came here in 1620 If not mabry sue them for being racist because most of them were white
What I'm getting at is one is just as foolish as the other I understand what you are saying but it was the territory that built and became the United States same people same land just a different day and way of government, if you were George Washington's slave in 1775 you were still his slave in 1776 no change for the slave, same people same owners same land same duty nothing changed for them.No, slavery only lasted 89 in the US. All numbers and names should be drawn from that small number. Granted, none should be considered, but why would we be on the hook for something that happened in another Empire?
What I'm getting at is one is just as foolish as the other I understand what you are saying but it was the territory that built and became the United States same people same land just a different day and way of government, if you were George Washington's slave in 1775 you were still his slave in 1776 no change for the slave, same people same owners same land same duty nothing changed for them.
And today, we are all still slaves owned by the government, even though most can't recognize it.Correct, in 1775, you were a slave in the British empire. 1776, you were a slave owned in the US of A.
But, reparations ideology says that people who's ancestors never had slaves, but died freeing them owe money to people who's ancestors never were slaves.This is not a matter of inherited criminal liability. It's a question of unresolved institutional liability and intergenerational economic consequence.
Reparations arguments generally are not saying “you are guilty for what your ancestors did.” They are saying that current U.S. society is historically continuous with systems that produced lineage-specific intergenerational effects, and that those effects justify lineage-conscious remedies.
Whether someone’s ancestors fought for the Union is morally relevant historically, but doesn't erase the existence of the underlying institutional systems or their downstream consequences.
I think that won the internet for today.But, reparations ideology says that people who's ancestors never had slaves, but died freeing them owe money to people who's ancestors never were slaves.
None of these schemes require any proof of any connection to slavery. Every one of them would take money from people who moved here after WWII and give it to people who snuck in illegally 5 years ago.
There were more white slaves in North Africa than there were black slaves in the US. So you could have people who's ancestors *were* slaves being forced to pay reparations to people who's ancestors were their slaves.
The entire thing is perverse.